Magna Carta Sword 13
We must not lack the argument on imitation. Of course this inscription is an imitation. But even this cipher may be an imitation. If it so, the composer of this splendid cipher must have left us some sort of proof of more later times.
When we replaced A-I-N-T with AMN’T, perhaps everyone would notice
holds. Someone also might have noticed AIN is a Scottish word meaning “own”.
At 3rd November 2015, online dictionary at Merriam-webster.com
AMN’T may be in Francis Bacon’s permissible range. But Both of AIN’T and AIN are meaningless for Francis Bacon. And we have proved that we can take the course without use of them. It is unlikely that the smart composer used avoidable new words for the proof of his imitation. So if this were imitation of Francis Bacon’s work, it would contains a self-contradiction. It is explicitly shown that the inscription is an imitation of that in the Magna Carta era. Then the composer must show the proof of own period explicitly, after the fashion of Bacon’s work. Where is it?